<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should the word &#8220;unsigned&#8221; be banned?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.recordunion.com/dogblog/2009/02/26/should-the-word-unsigned-be-banned/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.recordunion.com/dogblog/2009/02/26/should-the-word-unsigned-be-banned/</link>
	<description>The offical Record Union blog.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Topics about Music &#187; Should the word unsigned be banned?</title>
		<link>http://blog.recordunion.com/dogblog/2009/02/26/should-the-word-unsigned-be-banned/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Topics about Music &#187; Should the word unsigned be banned?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordunion.com/dogblog/?p=697#comment-32</guid>
		<description>[...] Moms amp; Dads: A Parenting Blog &#124; Sun-Sentinel Blogs created an interesting post today on Should the word unsigned be banned?Here&#8217;s a short outline The term “unsigned” has historically been used by the music business as an almost derogatory remark to denote artists and bands who haven’t yet signed to a label, be the label independent or major. Almost as if to say that the band isn’t “good enough” to be offered a record deal or that since they haven’t signed a deal, they have not yet reached “success”. There are a number of things wrong with this. Firstly, there are many great bands and artists without record deals playing superb music on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Moms amp; Dads: A Parenting Blog | Sun-Sentinel Blogs created an interesting post today on Should the word unsigned be banned?Here&#8217;s a short outline The term “unsigned” has historically been used by the music business as an almost derogatory remark to denote artists and bands who haven’t yet signed to a label, be the label independent or major. Almost as if to say that the band isn’t “good enough” to be offered a record deal or that since they haven’t signed a deal, they have not yet reached “success”. There are a number of things wrong with this. Firstly, there are many great bands and artists without record deals playing superb music on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

